CRAM ARCADE Open App

Kevin is a state-licensed MLO who allowed his license to lapse four years ago when he left the mortgage industry. He is now ready to return. He has not held any federal registration during the gap period. Under SAFE Act requirements, which of the following correctly describes Kevin's situation?

Uniform State Test (UST) · 11% of the SAFE examhard

Show the answer and explanation

Correct answer: Kevin is not required to retake the exam under the SAFE Act because his license lapsed for less than five years, though state-specific reinstatement and continuing education requirements may apply

The SAFE Act requires retesting only when a state-licensed MLO fails to maintain a valid license for five years or longer (not counting any period as a registered MLO). Kevin's license lapsed four years ago — under the five-year threshold — so he is not required to retake the national exam under the SAFE Act. Answer (A) incorrectly applies a three-year threshold that does not exist in the SAFE Act. Answer (C) is wrong — a lapsed license does not result in a permanent bar. Answer (D) misapplies the rule; five years have not elapsed, so retesting is not federally required. Note that states may impose additional reinstatement requirements, including continuing education completion, so Kevin should check his state's specific rules.

Drill 2,078 more questions like this, free

CRAM ARCADE has the full NMLS question bank, timed practice exams, focus drills on your weakest category, flashcards and spaced repetition. No credit card.

Start studying free