Ethics · 18% of the SAFE examhard
Correct answer: Disparate impact — a facially neutral credit requirement with disproportionate effect on protected classes
This is disparate impact. The 3-tradeline rule sounds objective and applies equally, but it disproportionately excludes groups who historically rely on alternative credit (recent immigrants, younger borrowers, certain minority communities). If the lender cannot demonstrate that this specific requirement is necessary for assessing creditworthiness AND that no less restrictive alternative exists (such as accepting alternative credit data), the policy violates fair lending laws. Many regulators now encourage acceptance of alternative credit precisely to address this type of impact.
CRAM ARCADE has the full NMLS question bank, timed practice exams, focus drills on your weakest category, flashcards and spaced repetition. No credit card.
Start studying free