During processing, an MLO notices that a loan application lists a borrower with an 800 credit score purchasing a property in a neighborhood where properties frequently sell to cash investors at steep discounts. The borrower's employer cannot be verified through standard means, the down payment funds appeared in the borrower's account 10 days ago with no documented source, and the seller is requiring a 10-day closing. Which combination of red flags most strongly suggests a straw buyer scheme is being perpetrated?

Question

Accepted Answer

The unverifiable employer, the unsourced recent deposit, and the unusually rapid closing timeline demanded by the seller The most compelling combination of red flags for a straw buyer scheme is: (1) an unverifiable employer — suggesting fabricated employment documentation common in straw buyer files; (2) an unsourced deposit that appeared recently — suggesting borrowed or transferred funds used to create the appearance of legitimate assets; and (3) a seller-driven compressed closing timeline — suggesting the true orchestrators want to collect loan proceeds quickly before scrutiny increases. A high credit score alone is not a red flag. While the investment neighborhood context adds suspicion, it alone is not determinative. The triad in answer C represents the intersection of identity fabrication, asset fraud, and transactional urgency that characterizes straw buyer operations.

Drill 2,078 more questions like this, free

More Ethics practice questions

Free practice by category