CRAM ARCADE Open App

Before the Dodd-Frank Act banned the practice, an MLO placed a borrower who qualified for a 6.0% rate into a 6.75% loan. The lender paid the MLO an additional 1.5% of the loan amount as a yield spread premium. On a $200,000 loan, how much extra compensation did the MLO receive through the YSP, and what is the primary ethical violation?

Ethics · 18% of the SAFE exammedium

Show the answer and explanation

Correct answer: $3,000; the MLO steered the borrower into a higher-rate loan than necessary to earn additional undisclosed compensation at the borrower's expense

1.5% of $200,000 = $3,000. The MLO earned $3,000 in additional compensation by placing the borrower in a rate 0.75% higher than they qualified for. This is predatory use of a yield spread premium — the MLO's financial incentive was misaligned with the borrower's interest. Pre-Dodd-Frank, YSPs were disclosed on the GFE but were still widely abused. Dodd-Frank Section 1403 prohibits compensation based on loan terms (including rate). RESPA Section 9 (A) deals with title insurance selection, not YSPs. The QM fee threshold (C) addresses points and fees, not rate steering. "$2,000; the MLO violated Regulation Z by charging po..." is incorrect because Dodd-Frank banned YSPs regardless of disclosure.

Drill 2,078 more questions like this, free

CRAM ARCADE has the full NMLS question bank, timed practice exams, focus drills on your weakest category, flashcards and spaced repetition. No credit card.

Start studying free