CRAM ARCADE Open App

Under HOEPA's protections against loan flipping, which of the following refinance transactions would most likely be considered to lack a 'net tangible benefit' to the borrower?

Ethics · 18% of the SAFE exammedium

Show the answer and explanation

Correct answer: Refinancing to lower the interest rate by 0.125% while rolling $8,500 in closing costs into a new 30-year loan, resetting the amortization schedule

A net tangible benefit requires that the refinance meaningfully improves the borrower's financial situation. Reducing the rate by only 0.125% while adding $8,500 to the loan balance and restarting a 30-year amortization clock results in the borrower paying substantially more over the life of the loan — this would fail a net tangible benefit analysis. The negligible rate improvement does not offset the additional debt and extended loan term. "Refinancing from a 30-year to a 15-year term at a lo..." (ARM to fixed) provides rate certainty and is generally accepted as a tangible benefit. "Refinancing from an adjustable-rate mortgage to a fi..." (accessing equity for a medical necessity) provides a clear, legitimate purpose. "Refinancing to lower the interest rate by 0.125% whi..." (shortening the term with a rate reduction) demonstrably benefits the borrower. HOEPA requires lenders to determine that a covered loan refinance provides a net tangible benefit before proceeding.

Drill 2,078 more questions like this, free

CRAM ARCADE has the full NMLS question bank, timed practice exams, focus drills on your weakest category, flashcards and spaced repetition. No credit card.

Start studying free