CRAM ARCADE Open App

A state regulator issues a consent order against an MLO requiring payment of a $15,000 fine and completion of 20 hours of remedial education within 90 days. The MLO pays the fine on day 85 but fails to complete the education requirement. The MLO then applies for license renewal. Which of the following best describes the most likely outcome?

Uniform State Test (UST) · 11% of the SAFE examhard

Show the answer and explanation

Correct answer: The regulator may deny the renewal application based on noncompliance with the consent order terms

A consent order is a binding legal agreement between the regulator and the MLO. Failure to comply with all terms — including the education requirement — constitutes a material breach of the consent order. State regulators have authority to deny license renewal applications when an MLO has failed to comply with outstanding regulatory orders. Partial compliance (paying the fine) does not satisfy full compliance with the order. "The regulator must grant a 90-day extension because..." is incorrect because compliance requires satisfying all terms, not just the financial component. "The consent order becomes void upon partial complian..." is incorrect because extensions to consent order deadlines are at the regulator's discretion and are not automatically granted for partial compliance. "The regulator must renew the license because the fin..." is incorrect because consent orders do not become void through partial compliance — they remain in effect until all conditions are satisfied or the regulator formally releases them.

Drill 2,078 more questions like this, free

CRAM ARCADE has the full NMLS question bank, timed practice exams, focus drills on your weakest category, flashcards and spaced repetition. No credit card.

Start studying free