A property sells for $120,000 in January. Sixty days later, it is listed and sold for $210,000 with a new appraisal supporting the higher value. An investigation later reveals the appraiser was paid by the seller and had no documented basis for the $90,000 increase. This scenario is best described as:

Question

Accepted Answer

An illegal property flipping scheme involving appraisal fraud Illegal property flipping involves rapidly reselling a property at an artificially inflated price, supported by a fraudulent appraisal. The rapid price jump with no legitimate market justification, combined with the seller paying the appraiser, are hallmarks of this scheme. Lenders lose money when borrowers default on inflated loans. "A legitimate appreciation scenario driven by market..." requires documented market evidence. "An illegal property flipping scheme involving apprai..." (predatory lending) involves lenders exploiting borrowers, not sellers exploiting lenders. "A violation of RESPA Section 8 due to undisclosed af..." (RESPA Section 8) prohibits kickbacks for referrals — the issue here is appraisal fraud, not referral fees.

Drill 2,078 more questions like this, free

More Ethics practice questions

Free practice by category