CRAM ARCADE Open App

An MLO is reviewing a loan file and notices that the borrower's bank statements show three large deposits — each for exactly $15,000 — made on three consecutive Fridays in the 60 days before the application date, with no corresponding payroll records or explanation. The borrower's stated income on the 1003 is $7,200 per month. Which of the following represents the MLO's best course of action and reasoning?

Ethics · 18% of the SAFE examhard

Show the answer and explanation

Correct answer: Flag the deposits as potential income or asset fraud red flags, require the borrower to provide a written explanation with supporting documentation before proceeding, and consider filing a Suspicious Activity Report if fraud is reasonably suspected

Large, round-dollar deposits that do not align with a borrower's documented income are classic red flags for income or asset fraud — commonly involving undisclosed gift funds without proper documentation, laundered funds, or fabricated asset accounts. The correct MLO response is to request a Letter of Explanation (LOE) and supporting documentation to verify the source of the funds before the loan proceeds. If fraud is reasonably suspected, the institution may be required to file a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) under FinCEN regulations implementing the Bank Secrecy Act (31 CFR 1029 for non-bank mortgage lenders; applicable depository institution rules for bank MLOs). "s stated monthly income of $7,200 and require no add..." is incorrect because three deposits totaling $45,000 over 60 days are not consistent with a $7,200 monthly income and cannot be accepted without documentation — agency guidelines require sourcing of large unexplained deposits. "Reject the application immediately without further r..." is incorrect because irregular lump-sum deposits cannot be averaged as income without documentation confirming their source, nature, and likelihood of continuance; agency guidelines require specific documentation for self-employment and other non-W2 income. "Average the three deposits into the borrower's month..." is incorrect for two reasons: first, unexplained deposits are red flags requiring investigation, not confirmed fraud; second, Regulation B governs equal credit opportunity and prohibits discrimination in lending — it does not define mortgage fraud, and immediate rejection without inquiry could itself constitute a fair lending violation.

Drill 2,078 more questions like this, free

CRAM ARCADE has the full NMLS question bank, timed practice exams, focus drills on your weakest category, flashcards and spaced repetition. No credit card.

Start studying free