A group of investors purchases a distressed home for $90,000, makes only cosmetic repairs, and then sells the property to an unsuspecting buyer for $210,000 based on a fraudulent appraisal. The buyer obtains a mortgage based on the inflated price. One week later, the buyer defaults and the lender discovers the property is worth only $95,000. Which element makes this transaction a fraudulent flipping scheme rather than a legitimate resale?

Question

Accepted Answer

The use of a fraudulent appraisal to support an artificially inflated sale price, causing the lender to fund a loan far exceeding the property's true value Property flipping becomes fraudulent when it involves a deliberately inflated appraisal designed to deceive the lender into funding a loan based on a false property value. The key element distinguishing fraud from a legitimate flip is the misrepresentation — specifically, the collusion to produce an appraisal that does not reflect actual market value. "," is incorrect because rapid resale is not inherently illegal; FHA has anti-flipping guidelines that restrict certain short-term resales, but these are seller eligibility rules, not fraud definitions, and legitimate flips with real improvements are permissible. "The use of a fraudulent appraisal to support an arti..." is incorrect because FHA's 90-day anti-flipping rule addresses loan eligibility timing, not a legal requirement to make specific improvements — and this scenario may not involve FHA financing at all. "The investors' failure to make substantial improveme..." is incorrect because a default does not retroactively create fraud; the fraud occurred at origination when the false appraisal was submitted.

Drill 2,078 more questions like this, free

More Ethics practice questions

Free practice by category